In “Writing Your Way To Happiness”, Parker-Pope (2015) presents a series of research studies to highlight the benefits that people can gain from expressive writing. One of the benefits of expressive writing is that it helps to alleviate conflict between married couples. A research study was done on 120 married couples where they had to write about their conflict for a third-party perspective. The outcome showed an improvement in family relations among couples who engages in expressive writing as opposed to those who did not.
While writing allows the writer to express his troubles and reconstruct his thoughts , it does not always result in a desirable outcome. This is because expressive writing allows him to freely express his thoughts, which includes his disgust toward the other party. In the case of married couple, the wife, for instance, might write down all the negative attitudes and characteristics of her husband throughout their marriage life. Looking at all the unfavourable attitudes of her husband that she has written might only add to her disgust towards her husband instead of alleviating the conflict. The tension between the couple would escalate if both the husband and wife frequently write about the negativity of their spouse. This prolongs the conflict between the couple and consensus would be hard to achieve. A mediator might need to intervene during the process of writing in order to guide and assist the couple.
Furthermore, the process of writing might be seen as a burden to couples who already have so many things to manage. Writing requires discipline, time and effort in order for us to gain its benefit. However, when facing a conflict, we usually do not think rationally and therefore our actions are reckless. This hinders us from achieving a meaningful outcome from expressive writing since our mind is not in the state of tranquility. Writing also requires a certain amount of time, which we better spend the time doing something else. For instance, couples who are in a conflict would better off be doing something that divert their attention from thinking about the conflict such as watching movies or engage in physical activities as opposed to writing.
In addition to that, writing only helps to temporarily ease the problems that married couples face. Expressive writing enables the couple to express their problems such that it acts as a coping mechanism for them. However, these coping mechanism is only effective in the short run. As long as the couple do not take practical measures to improve their marital happiness, their conflict would not subside. For instance, if a couple who are facing with conflicts does not try to solve the root cause of their conflict, even if they engage in expressive writing, their conflict will persist in the long run. Their conflict would be worse if both the husband and wife uses expressive writing as a platform to mock their spouse and rant their anger severely.
In conclusion, there is no perfect and absolute mechanism that would best resolve conflicts within married couples. Expressive writing would be more effective in coping with these conflicts only if certain conditions are met. This includes regulating and controlling what is being written in order to avoid undesirable emotions. Also, couples should take additional measures beside writing so as to achieve an optimal outcome when dealing with a conflict.
Hi Taq
ReplyDeleteI feel that your reader's respond lacks the opinion of the writer. There is no reference or any of Parker-Pope's claims throughout the whole post. Also, I feel that there is a lack of link to your stand after each paragraph. e.g. For instance, couples who are in a conflict would better off be doing something that divert their attention from thinking about the conflict such as watching movies or engage in physical activities as opposed to writing. --> So? What is the link to your thesis/argument?
1) "While writing allows the writer to express his troubles and reconstruct his thoughts ," a writer instead of THE writer and there shouldn't be a spacing before the coma
2) "which includes his disgust toward the other party." I think which includes is a little too pessimistic so maybe you can change it to "which MAY include his disgust..."
3) "In the case of married couple" in the case of A married couple
4) "A mediator might need to intervene during the process of writing in order to guide and assist the couple." um I don't see the need for this since it does not strengthen or help your response
5) "we usually do not think rationally and therefore our actions are reckless." This is too strong a statement?? and therefore our actions may be a little reckless
6) "This hinders us from achieving a meaningful outcome from expressive writing since our mind is not in the state of tranquility." This MAY hinder us
7) " Writing also requires a certain amount of time, which we better spend the time doing something else. " which we could have better spent the time doing something else
8) "if a couple who are facing with conflicts" if a couple who is facing some conflicts
9) " Expressive writing would be more effective in coping with these conflicts only if certain conditions are met" Not clear/sentence sounds weird
Conclusion helps improve your overall argument.
Language:
Too definitive
zijian shasha
Hi Taq,
ReplyDeleteContent
-Summary is not fully covered with main ideas and methods of how expressive writing should be conducted. Instead, a fairly huge proportion of summary talks about the experiments, which is not the main focus of the passage.
-Many critical points are made based on assumptions, that in many cases might not be entirely true. For example, 'However, when facing a conflict, we usually do not think rationally and therefore our actions are reckless.' This might not be the case as some may have better anger management skills than others.
-The evaluation and criticism pointed on the article are written in multiple sweeping statements. There might not be definitive cases in real life, but your writing made it sound definitive.
Transition
-The transition might not seem very coherent. Having 3 paragraphs with mainly negative thoughts and criticism, the conclusion ended the entire response in a 'sit-on-the-fence' thesis. 'Certain conditions' and 'Additional measures' are not clarified on the exact basis of assumption.
Thank you, Taq, for this effort. I see that your peers have given lots of useful and appropriate feedback. This is especially true regarding the problems with the summary and with the lack of any connection to parker-Pope's views within the response itself.
ReplyDeleteI think what you have done is taken the idea of focusing on one point and exploited that a bit too far. Your focus on marriage is well taken, but you need to align your own ideas with those of the original author, either in the way of a rebuttal or an agreement. Of course, you are also entitled to develop your own ideas, and you have provided lots of support in that regard. I appreciate your developing these ideas from what seems perhaps to be your personal experience. But all of this would be even further strengthened if it were grounded a bit more on your reading/cited sources.
I look forward to your next draft.